The recent ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan has sparked considerable discussion, particularly regarding the extent of U.S. mediation in achieving this outcome. While initial reports and statements, including those from former U.S. President Donald Trump, suggested a significant U.S. role, the Indian Foreign Secretary's remarks and subsequent reports indicate a more nuanced picture.

On Saturday, May 10, 2025, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri announced that the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMO) of India and Pakistan had agreed to halt all firing and military action along the land, air, and sea borders, effective from 5 p.m. that day. He stated that the DGMO of Pakistan initiated the call to his Indian counterpart at 3:35 p.m., leading to the mutual agreement. Instructions were issued on both sides to implement the understanding, with a follow-up discussion between the DGMOs planned for May 12, 2025.

This announcement followed claims by former U.S. President Donald Trump that the U.S. had brokered the ceasefire. Trump declared on his social media platform that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate ceasefire" after a "long night of talks mediated by the United States". U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also stated that he and U.S. Vice President JD Vance had been in contact with senior Indian and Pakistani officials, including Prime Ministers Narendra Modi and Shehbaz Sharif, over the preceding 48 hours. Rubio emphasized the need for both sides to de-escalate and re-establish direct communication, offering U.S. support in facilitating productive discussions.

However, other reports suggest that the ceasefire was worked out directly between the DGMOs of India and Pakistan. An ANI report indicated that the Pakistani DGMO initiated the call, after which discussions led to the understanding. This version of events downplays the direct role of the U.S. in mediating the agreement. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, in his statement, did not mention any U.S. mediation.

Adding to the complexity, it was reported that U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio had separate conversations with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar. During these conversations, Rubio allegedly emphasized the need for de-escalation and offered U.S. assistance in fostering constructive discussions to prevent future disputes.

The situation is further complicated by the context of recent events. The ceasefire followed a period of heightened tensions, including cross-border missile firings, which were triggered by a gun massacre last month that India blames Pakistan for. Concerns about escalating conflict led to calls for de-escalation from the United States and other international actors.

In conclusion, while the U.S. seemingly played a role in encouraging de-escalation through diplomatic channels, the actual ceasefire agreement appears to have been reached directly between the military leadership of India and Pakistan. The Foreign Secretary's statement, along with reports highlighting direct communication between the DGMOs, suggests that the U.S. role might have been more of facilitation and encouragement rather than direct mediation. The exact nature and extent of U.S. involvement remain somewhat unclear, but the available information suggests a bilateral understanding reached amidst international pressure for de-escalation.